From the operator’s own terms
Rocketpot writes down the most, and contradicts itself on one point
Rocketpot puts more checkable material on the table than any other row: an amount for the identity check, a clause number, a cap and the only deadline in the material, 30 calendar days. Two of the figures contradict each other.
The row that writes out the most figures
Of the nine rows counted, Rocketpot is the one that puts the most in writing. The operator states an amount at which identity documents are requested, cites clause numbers, publishes a cap on withdrawals, lists its coins and states a founding year.
That is also why the row sits highest in our measure. The measure weighs published material and nothing else, leaving aside payouts, customer service and the game range, and what it fails to capture is on the page about the measure behind a top list.
The number described in two ways
The company behind the brand is Danneskjold Ventures B.V., and the number given is 1668/JAZ. It belongs to the older Curaçao series, and unlike the newer OGL numbers it returned nothing in the certificate register. We read it only in the operator’s own documents.
The description also shifts between pages. The terms say the company is owned and operated under registration number 1668/JAZ, while the front page describes the same figure as a gambling licence. A company register and a gambling permit are two different registers, and the documents disagree about which of them the figure comes from.
The same number series turns up once more in the material: Bitcasino.io gives 1668/JAZ in its anti-money-laundering policy even though its certificate reads a different number. What the coincidence is due to we have left uninvestigated.
Two amounts for the same check
Clause 11.4 speaks of withdrawals exceeding the equivalent of 0.05 BTC or 2,500 USD. Clause 12.4 in the same document speaks of additional checks for withdrawals over 2,000 USD.
The table carries 2,500 USD, because that is the clause the operator itself points to. We set out the lower figure here rather than discarding it, for a practical reason: the lower threshold is the one that bites first. The contradiction sits in the source rather than in our reading.
The check can moreover fall earlier in the sequence than the amounts suggest. The terms permit documents to be requested before a deposit is credited, that is, before play rather than only before the withdrawal.
The only deadline in the whole material
Rocketpot is the only one of the ten operators that spells out how long you have. Requested documents on identity and source of funds must be supplied within thirty calendar days.
It is worth noting what that deadline covers and what it leaves out. It binds the customer, not the operator: a corresponding statement of time for the handling is missing from the text. But a deadline that is written down can at least be used to hold somebody to something, and eight of the other nine texts lack a deadline entirely.
The monthly cap that is conditional
Clause 11.5 gives 5,000 USD per month, and it is the lowest published cap among the ten rows. The sentence stops short of a general monthly cap, however.
It deals with winnings of 5,000 dollars or more, and it is for such winnings that the operator reserves the right to pay out at most 5,000 dollars a month. A win below that level falls outside the clause. The difference is large in practice, and it is invisible in a table that only prints the figure; the four caps compared with each other are on the page about identity checks and withdrawals.
The text we worked from is the consolidated wording under SFS 2026:90, in force since 1 May 2026. This is where Chapter 19 on unlawful gambling operations sits, together with 14 kap. 12 § on self-exclusion and the two repealed sections in Chapter 18.
The coins, and why the count is blunt
The operator lists thirteen coins, which is the longest list in the table together with Wolf.bet.
This particular list shows at the same time why the figure should be read carefully. Two of the thirteen entries are tether in two forms, on two different chains. Counting them as two makes the list one entry longer than counting them as one, and we have left the entries as the operator wrote them.
A longer count therefore means more rows in a list, rather than lower fees or a better operator.
What is not in the documents
We failed to read any list of game suppliers, and nothing is therefore said here about the size of the range. That is a gap in our material rather than a judgement about the range.
The country list covers 34 countries, and Sweden is absent from it. That is the operator’s own statement about itself at a particular moment, read on 26 August 2026, and such a list can change without anyone announcing it.
The founding year 2018 comes from the operator’s own page. It is one of two such years in the table, and a year in a footer cannot be looked up with anyone else; the measure of age that can be checked is the register date, which is set out on the page about new casinos.
What the row leaves unsettled
A permit from Curaçao leaves the gambling unlicensed under spellagen, and it changes nothing in the reach of the exclusion under 14 kap. 12 §. What that section covers is on the page about how far Spelpaus reaches.
We lack an account with the operator and have deposited nothing. The details above were read in the operator’s own documents on 26 August 2026, and will be corrected in the open if they turn out to be wrong.
Free support on 020-81 91 00, with no ID required. Stödlinjen is run by Stockholms läns sjukvårdsområde with funding from the Public Health Agency of Sweden, which makes it a public service rather than an industry one.